
You can thank my esteemed colleagues at Flavorpill for that one, as well as this royal comparison, which is interesting but not nearly as entertaining (or crude):

Random rants, ramblings, observations, and other awesomeness that captures my attention and imagination; digital snapshots of my so-called "crazy train of thought."


Oh, the joys of moving.
I recently relocated the New York City, and, let me tell you, moving sucks. I’ve done it so much, you’d think I could pack and unpack in my sleep. Alas, that is not the case. I despise packing, and resent having to unpack just a day or two later. And don’t even get me started on the joy that can only be experienced while searching for people to live with. It’s like survival of the fittest, where the fastest to respond to a Craigslist ad wins, and all they can do is hope that the people their newfound roommates aren’t nuts.
I have to charming and completely random roomies, one of which took it upon himself to serenade me (and the other roomie) this morning the crack of 8:30 or so a.m. Yes, that’s right. He was playing guitar and singing. And, suffice to say, I’m pretty confident he was treating us to some original material that will never see the light of day, radio airplay, or even a sad open mic session at a neighborhood cafe. He’s lucky I have a sense of humor, and was already up.
Oh, the joys of moving, indeed.
One of the things I find most interesting about moving into a new place is discovering who your new neighbors are. I always hope they’re Mr. Quiet and Mrs. Minds-Her-Own-Business, not Mr. Noisy-Sex-All-Night, Dr. Drug-Dealer/Junkie, or Miss Musician-Who-Practices-Her-African-Drum-Routine-Before-Work-Every-Day.
I have no idea who my new neighbors are. I have yet to meet (or, thankfully, hear) a single one of them. However, I have seen their Wi-fi connections… and what Wi-fi connections they are!
When I opened my computer for the first time, I was greeted by a few dozen signals, and a few of them stood out:
… Now guess which one is my new roomies’ Wi-fi network. (They insist it was a former roomie who named it, but I’m not convinced.)
It’s no secret that I love the New Yorker. Heck, I’m lucky to call a handful of their cartoonists friends. Still, two things happened this week that solidified the publication’s strangle-hold of my heart:
#1: The finally — and, some might say, rather reluctantly — gave print subscribers full access to the web content AND the iPad app (which, up until this point, was only available if purchased on a week-to-week basis, for a whopping $5/week) at no extra charge. FINALLY. Welcome to the future of media, duh. Give people what they want how they want it! Don’t alienate (and lose) your audience! Don’t expect people to pay for the same thing twice! … the folks at the NY’er (and Condé Nast) are a smart bunch. I can’t understand why it took them this long to figure all of it out.
#2: This hilarious letter was sent to all NY’er subscribers, effectively reinstating my faith in the publication, and its leadership:
Dear Laughter Lovers, When Roger Ebert won Caption Contest #281, I mentioned that he had entered one hundred and seven contests, but that others had entered even more often. So here’s a shout-out to the ten most devoted entrants:
John Shields: 279; Dominic Ciafardini: 278; Preston Macdougal: 275; Sy Gaffin: 272; Rick Kaufman: 270; George Gopper: 269; Alice Gochman: 266; Jim Bertram: 264; Julian Wheeler: 263; William Keller: 262
Unfortunately, none of them have won. But I applaud their persistence. As I’ve pointed out, persistence in the face of failure is often the key to eventual success, except in skydiving. Persistence certainly paid off for Mr. Don Symons, who entered two hundred and thirty-one contests before winning. But Don and Roger might resent John Pignata, who won our most recent contest, #282, on his first try. To see what else could be gleaned from the data, I paid a visit the Bureau of Caption-Contest Statistics, in their climate-controlled aerie atop the Condé Nast Building. We looked at the winners of Caption Contests #250 through #282. Of the thirty-two winners, twenty-two are men and ten are women. Does this confirm that men are funnier than women? Not really. Many more men enter the contest than women, and many more men enter regularly. Of our top ten überenterers, only one is a woman. And when you look at the last thirty-two contests and factor in productivity, women come out on top. The twenty-two winning men entered an average of 70.22 contests, but the ten women averaged 6.4 entries—and four of them won on their first attempt. The only man to do so was the aforementioned John Pignata. Cheers, Bob Mankoff
… I had no idea so many people entered the caption contest so many times. Remember, there are just 52 weeks in a year, and 47 New Yorkers a year (there are a few double issues), so John Shields has entered every caption contest for nearly five years… without a single win. And still, he doesn’t show any signs of giving up. Talk about persistence! (Meanwhile, he is probably talking about conspiracy theories.) Same goes for Mr. Ciafardini, Mr. Macdougal, Mr. Gaffin, and the rest of the incredibly not-funny, yet persistent entrants.
Radioactive water continues to gush into the Pacific from Japan's damaged nuclear reactors, and no one really knows what's going to happen. The "experts" say there's little chance of "significant" health risks to seafood-eaters such as myself, but I don't buy it. (Or any Pacific seafood anymore.)
Apparently everything that happens in Vegas can stay in Vegas, after all.